Jack Smith, the embattled Special Counsel prosecuting President Donald Trump, may soon find himself on the wrong side of the justice system. A whistleblower complaint filed with the Department of Justice Inspector General in late 2023 accuses Smith of orchestrating an international extortion and bribery scheme while he served as a prosecutor at The Hague.
Ignored by mainstream media but detailed in a 151-page complaint reviewed by The Gateway Pundit and others, the allegations are stunning—and if proven true, could bring Smith’s credibility and career crashing down.
The Allegations: Blackmail, Bribes, and Bitcoin
According to the whistleblower report:
-
Smith allegedly dispatched intermediaries across Eastern Europe during his time at the International Criminal Court, threatening individuals with war crimes indictments unless they paid off his team.
-
The demanded bribes ranged from $400,000 to $9 million. Some payments were allegedly made in Bitcoin; others through physical cash deliveries.
-
One instance allegedly involved Smith attempting to extract $100 million from a head of state—who refused and is now imprisoned.
Multiple European whistleblowers supplied documents, affidavits, financial records, and even text messages to back their claims. Despite the gravity of the evidence, their attempts to report the misconduct to the DOJ were stonewalled.
The DOJ Connection: Buried Evidence and a Shocking Conflict
One whistleblower eventually reached DOJ official Alan Tieger, believing him to be a neutral party. That assumption turned out to be false—and potentially catastrophic. Tieger, it turns out, had deep ties to Smith and later replaced him as the American prosecutor at the ICC.
In a recorded 90-minute Zoom call, Tieger allegedly tried to coerce whistleblowers into retracting their claims. When they refused, he appeared to go through the motions of documenting their allegations—only to reportedly bury the evidence.
This interaction suggests a deliberate effort to shield Smith from scrutiny—and raises urgent questions about corruption and cover-ups inside the Department of Justice itself.
Trump Prosecution: A Bargain to Avoid Prison?
A theory gaining traction among insiders is that Jack Smith’s sudden reappearance on U.S. soil and his controversial prosecution of President Trump may not be coincidental. The whistleblower report suggests that Attorney General Merrick Garland may have learned of Smith’s alleged crimes and used them as leverage:
“Come back to D.C., prosecute Trump no matter how far-fetched the charges, or we throw you in prison for 30 years.”
This would explain why Smith, knowing Trump still held active Department of Energy clearance, pushed forward with an indictment over classified materials—a charge most legal experts had never seen applied in such a context. Likewise, his approach to January 6 appears engineered more for political sabotage than legal coherence.
Media Blackout, But the Dam Is Breaking
Despite the severity of the accusations, corporate media has largely stayed silent. But with the complaint, documentation, and even recorded calls now circulating through independent channels, the story is becoming impossible to ignore.
If the whistleblower’s account is accurate, Jack Smith may not only be discredited—he could be prosecuted.
In a justice system already suffering from a credibility crisis, this case could prove the most explosive scandal yet. The only question left: Will anyone at the DOJ be brave enough to act on it?